CanaGrants / 博客 / SR&ED 2026:开支上限提至 …
资助攻略 2026年6月4日·8 分钟

SR&ED 2026:开支上限提至 $6M,对你的退税到底意味着什么

2025 预算将 SR&ED 开支上限翻倍至 $6M,可退还 ITC 上限升至 $2.1M。谁真正受益,以及仍让 CCPC 损失最多的三个申报错误。

研发团队 · 温哥华

Budget 2025 delivered the biggest change to SR&ED in a decade — doubling the expenditure limit to $6M and lifting the refundable credit ceiling to $2.1M. If your company is scaling its R&D, the math just changed in your favour. Here is exactly what moved, who benefits, and the mistakes that still leave money on the table.

What actually changed

SR&ED is Canada’s largest innovation program: roughly $4.5 billion is paid out every year. For Canadian-Controlled Private Corporations (CCPCs), the headline benefit is a 35% refundable investment tax credit on eligible R&D — a cash refund even if you owe no tax.

Budget 2025 raised the annual expenditure limit on which that enhanced 35% rate applies from $3M to $6M, and correspondingly lifted the maximum refundable credit from about $1.05M to $2.1M per year. It also raised the taxable-capital phase-out range so more mid-sized firms keep the enhanced rate as they grow.

$6MThe new annual expenditure limit eligible for the enhanced 35% refundable rate — double the previous $3M.

Who actually benefits

Not everyone. A pre-revenue startup spending $400K a year on development was already well under the old $3M limit — its refund is unchanged. The firms that gain are the ones that had outgrown the ceiling: scaling CCPCs spending between $3M and $6M of qualified R&D a year. For them, the change can roughly double the refundable portion of the claim.

✦ In plain English Verified · Jun 2026

If your CCPC spends more than $3M a year on eligible R&D, the new $6M limit can nearly double your refundable credit — from roughly $1.05M to as much as $2.1M. Below $3M of spend, your refund is unchanged, but the higher phase-out threshold means you keep the enhanced rate longer as you grow.

The three claim mistakes that cost the most

01Thin contemporaneous documentation — The CRA wants evidence the work was uncertain and systematic, written as it happened — not reconstructed at filing. Time tracking against specific experiments is the single biggest determinant of a clean review.
02Claiming routine engineering — Work that applies known techniques without technological uncertainty is not eligible. The line between “hard engineering” and genuine experimental development is where most claims get trimmed.
03Mishandling assistance and subcontractors — Government assistance (including IRAP contributions) reduces your SR&ED-eligible base, and arm’s-length subcontractor costs are claimed at 80%. Get the stacking order wrong and you either over-claim or leave credit unused.

How it stacks with IRAP and provincial credits

SR&ED rarely travels alone. Most R&D-intensive companies pair it with NRC IRAP, which funds the project while you spend, and with provincial credits layered on top. Because IRAP contributions reduce your SR&ED base, the order you apply in changes your cash flow — which is exactly the trap we cover in our IRAP vs SR&ED guide.

PA
作者 Priya Anand
CanaGrants 分析师替你读遍每一份官方来源。本服务与加拿大政府无关联。
继续阅读

更多博客指南。

免费套餐 · 无需信用卡

在一处查看你符合条件的所有补助、抵免与招标。

一次性建立企业档案,获得全部 6,686 个开放机会的 AI 匹配分。免费开始。