CanaGrants / Blog / SR&ED in 2026: what the $6M expenditure-limit …
Funding guides Jun 4, 2026·8 min read

SR&ED in 2026: what the $6M expenditure-limit change actually means for your refund

Budget 2025 doubled the SR&ED expenditure limit to $6M and lifted the refundable ITC ceiling to $2.1M. Here is who actually benefits, and the three claim mistakes that still cost CCPCs the most.

R&D team · Vancouver, BC

Budget 2025 delivered the biggest change to SR&ED in a decade — doubling the expenditure limit to $6M and lifting the refundable credit ceiling to $2.1M. If your company is scaling its R&D, the math just changed in your favour. Here is exactly what moved, who benefits, and the mistakes that still leave money on the table.

What actually changed

SR&ED is Canada’s largest innovation program: roughly $4.5 billion is paid out every year. For Canadian-Controlled Private Corporations (CCPCs), the headline benefit is a 35% refundable investment tax credit on eligible R&D — a cash refund even if you owe no tax.

Budget 2025 raised the annual expenditure limit on which that enhanced 35% rate applies from $3M to $6M, and correspondingly lifted the maximum refundable credit from about $1.05M to $2.1M per year. It also raised the taxable-capital phase-out range so more mid-sized firms keep the enhanced rate as they grow.

$6MThe new annual expenditure limit eligible for the enhanced 35% refundable rate — double the previous $3M.

Who actually benefits

Not everyone. A pre-revenue startup spending $400K a year on development was already well under the old $3M limit — its refund is unchanged. The firms that gain are the ones that had outgrown the ceiling: scaling CCPCs spending between $3M and $6M of qualified R&D a year. For them, the change can roughly double the refundable portion of the claim.

✦ In plain English Verified · Jun 2026

If your CCPC spends more than $3M a year on eligible R&D, the new $6M limit can nearly double your refundable credit — from roughly $1.05M to as much as $2.1M. Below $3M of spend, your refund is unchanged, but the higher phase-out threshold means you keep the enhanced rate longer as you grow.

The three claim mistakes that cost the most

01Thin contemporaneous documentation — The CRA wants evidence the work was uncertain and systematic, written as it happened — not reconstructed at filing. Time tracking against specific experiments is the single biggest determinant of a clean review.
02Claiming routine engineering — Work that applies known techniques without technological uncertainty is not eligible. The line between “hard engineering” and genuine experimental development is where most claims get trimmed.
03Mishandling assistance and subcontractors — Government assistance (including IRAP contributions) reduces your SR&ED-eligible base, and arm’s-length subcontractor costs are claimed at 80%. Get the stacking order wrong and you either over-claim or leave credit unused.

How it stacks with IRAP and provincial credits

SR&ED rarely travels alone. Most R&D-intensive companies pair it with NRC IRAP, which funds the project while you spend, and with provincial credits layered on top. Because IRAP contributions reduce your SR&ED base, the order you apply in changes your cash flow — which is exactly the trap we cover in our IRAP vs SR&ED guide.

PA
Written by Priya Anand
CanaGrants analysts read every official source so you don’t have to. Not affiliated with the Government of Canada.
Keep reading

More guides from the blog.

Free tier · No credit card

See every grant, credit and tender you qualify for — in one place.

Build your business profile once. Get an AI fit score on all 6,686 open opportunities. Free to start.